A practical guide to DPDP Act compliance for SaaS companies, covering consent, legacy personal data, consent records, and withdrawal requests.

As SaaS and technology companies prepare for the DPDP Act's next implementation milestone, three questions come up more than any others: when consent is actually required, what to do with data collected before the law existed, and how to manage consent records once they're in place. Here's a practical breakdown of all three.

When must a SaaS company obtain consent to process personal data?

Consent is the default lawful basis under the DPDP Act, and SaaS companies need to secure it before processing kicks in for most use cases not after.

• Before collection, not after the fact: Consent must be obtained at or before the point personal data is collected for a specified purpose, not retrofitted once processing has already started.
• Tied to a specific purpose, not blanket use: A single broad "I agree to the terms" doesn't cover every downstream use each distinct processing purpose (product delivery, analytics, marketing) needs its own clearly stated basis.
• Free, specific, informed, and unambiguous: Pre-ticked boxes, bundled consent, or vague language won't hold up the user needs to understand exactly what they're agreeing to and be able to say no without losing core functionality.

How should companies manage personal data collected before the DPDP framework takes effect?

Legacy data doesn't get a free pass it needs to be brought up to the same standard as anything collected under the new framework.

• Audit what you're holding and why: Companies should review existing personal data holdings to identify what was collected, under what basis, and whether that basis still qualifies as valid under the Act.
• Close the consent gap where it exists: Where no valid lawful basis can be demonstrated for continued processing, companies need to either obtain fresh consent or stop processing that data for the purposes in question.
• Update notice and consent mechanisms going forward: Legacy remediation only holds if the systems collecting new data are already aligned with DPDP requirements otherwise the same gap reopens immediately.

How should SaaS companies manage consent records and withdrawal requests?

Consent isn't a one-time event companies need to be able to account for it on an ongoing basis, including when it's withdrawn.

• Keep an auditable consent trail: Maintain a retrievable record of what consent was given, for what purpose, when, and through what mechanism so it can be produced on demand rather than reconstructed from logs.
• Make withdrawal as easy as giving consent: If consent was given with a click, withdrawal shouldn't require an email to support and once withdrawn, processing tied to that purpose must stop without unnecessary delay.
• Propagate withdrawal across every system, not just one: Customer data often lives in analytics tools, backups, and third-party integrations a withdrawal that updates the primary database but not the rest is a compliance gap that looks fine on paper and fails when tested.

Where this gets difficult in practice ?

Each of these obligations sounds straightforward in isolation. The difficulty shows up when they have to work together, continuously, across a live product: new consent has to be captured correctly at sign-up, legacy data has to be reconciled against records that may be incomplete, and a withdrawal request has to reliably reach every system holding that user's data not just the one it was submitted through.

This is exactly the kind of cross-system tracking that's hard to sustain manually, especially as a SaaS platform scales, adds vendors, or expands into new markets. A compliance management system that keeps consent status, purpose mapping, and legacy data remediation visible in one place rather than relying on separate teams to each remember their piece of it is what turns this from a recurring audit risk into a process that runs on its own.

Strengthen Your DPDP Compliance with Ricago:
Track DPDP obligations, assign ownership, monitor compliance actions, and maintain audit-ready records in one compliance management system.

Explore Ricago’s Compliance Management System

FAQ:

1. When must SaaS companies obtain consent under the DPDP Act?
   Consent should generally be obtained before or at the time personal data is collected for the relevant purpose.
2. Does the DPDP Act apply to personal data collected before implementation?
   Legacy personal data should be reviewed to determine whether continued processing is permitted and appropriately managed.

      3.Should SaaS companies maintain consent records?
         Yes, organisations should maintain retrievable records showing             what consent was given, when, and for which purpose.

4. What happens when customer data is stored across multiple systems?
   Consent withdrawal and related data actions need to be appropriately managed across relevant systems and third-party integrations.
5. How can a compliance management system support DPDP compliance?
   It can help track obligations, assign ownership, monitor actions, and maintain compliance records in one system.